<![CDATA[Gawker: Joe Bruno]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Joe Bruno]]> http://gawker.com/tag/joe bruno http://gawker.com/tag/joe bruno <![CDATA[ Big swinging Republican political consultant ... ]]> Big swinging Republican political consultant Roger Stone has "resigned" in the wake of accusations that he left an obscene phone message on Governor Spitzer's father's answering machine. Stone still proclaims his innocence, but it's pretty clear that the state Republican party realizes the last thing they want to do is make the governor look like a victim, which is a role Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno would like to preserve for himself. [NYP]

]]>
Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:24:36 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292388&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Who Made Mean Calls To Governor Spitzer's Dad? ]]> Things just keep getting weirder for Eliot Spitzer. The papers are awash this morning with the news that Bernard Spitzer, father of the beleaguered governor, received an abusive phone call from Republican political consultant (and, as the Post notes, known swinger) Roger Stone. The governor is, of course, currently embroiled in the controversy over whether or not he directed the state police to issue damaging information about Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno's use of state aircraft for political purposes, but the current fuss concerns an earlier scandal—taking money from his dad.

Back in 1994, when Spitzer made his first, unsuccessful run for Attorney General, his dad loaned him $4.3 million for the campaign; during his 1998 run, Spitzer admitted that he had lied about repaying the loan. Cut to the present: Senate Republicans, seeking to damage the governor, are investigating the loans. Stone's phone message to the elder Spitzer, using the kind of language one usually expects from the governor, went like this:

You will be subpoenaed to testify before the Senate Committee on Investigations on your shady campaign loans. You will be compelled by the Senate sergeant at arms. If you resist the subpoena, you will be arrested and brought to Albany. And there is not a goddamn thing your phony, psycho, piece-of-shit son can do about it. Bernie, your phony loans are about to catch up with you. You will be forced to tell the truth and the fact that your son's a pathological liar will be known to all.
Wow, nice way to talk to an elderly grandfather suffering from Parkinson's disease! Roger Stone should be ashamed of himself! Except Stone claims that he had nothing to do with the call, despite the fact that it was clearly traced to a phone at his Central Park South apartment.

Stone tells the Times that:

[H]is apartment building on Central Park South is owned by H. Dale Hemmerdinger, a fund-raiser for Mr. Spitzer who is the governor's nominee to be chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and suggested that allies of the governor might have given access to his apartment to someone who made the threatening call. An official at Mr. Hemmerdinger's company said she was not prepared to comment.

Mr. Stone said: "They have unfettered access to my apartment. I am on television constantly. As Gore Vidal said, never pass up the chance to have sex or be on television. Putting together a voice tape that sounds like me wouldn't be hard to do."

Mr. Stone said he could not remember where he was on the date of the call and had no specific evidence that his apartment had been entered without authorization. But he said he believed that things have been missing from his apartment recently.

Perhaps realizing that his excuse sounds sort of like a lot of totally crazy bullshit, Stone somehow remembers his whereabouts when the message was left: He tells the Sun that he was taking in a performance of Frost/Nixon, the play about our dirtiest trickster president (for whom, unsurprisingly, Stone once worked). Stone sees a vast conspiracy.

He's not the only one. Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf also thinks there might be a cunning strategy at play, but on the part of the Republicans: "The loan story is revived and Stone gets a black eye. Stone can live with a black eye but the governor doesn't need another bad story. Some people say bad things about Roger Stone, but he doesn't care. Stone can't be hurt, but the governor can. It's not the wackiest theory I ever heard."

And that pretty much sums up Albany for you: Everyone is so crooked and corrupt and looking to screw everyone else that it's not only believable that the governor might orchestrate an angry call to his father in an attempt to gin up sympathy, but it's equally credible that the opposition may have committed the act simply to keep the governor's tarnished image at the top of the news. If we're Andrew Cuomo we're going to sit back very quietly for the next three years and wait for our shot at the mansion.

Also, if you're scoring at home, the Times was the only paper out of the three major dailies and The Sun to spell out the word "shit." Good for them.

Gov's dad threatened [NYDN]
The Phone Call That's Rocked the Capital [NYS]
Politics Seen in Nasty Call to Spitzer's Father [NYT]
PSYCHO RANT AT GOV DAD [NYP]
[Image: NYP]

]]>
Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:50:50 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292158&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Joe Bruno Takes A Punch ]]> Bruno Does Joe Bruno feel the noose tightening around his neck?As Governor Eliot Spitzer continues to die the death of a thousand cuts in the ongoing investigation of Statetroopergate or whatever the hell we're calling it, an interesting facet to the examination of the use of state planes for political purposes by the Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno (R-Graftsville) - the thing that got the governor into trouble in the first place - emerged yesterday.

Attorney General Cuomo relied on a phantom ethics opinion to exonerate the Senate majority leader, Joseph Bruno, of charges that he misused state aircraft.

In absolving the Republican state Senate majority leader of any wrongdoing, a report issued last month by the attorney general's office cited what it described as an "opinion" issued by the New York State Ethics Commission in 1995.

The opinion cited by the report does not exist in writing and never did. No formal opinion on the use of state aircraft has ever been issued by the ethics commission.

What's that about? Another sign that the Spitzer people, who are probably furious with the fact that no one gives a shit how many Nascar races the governor shows up to when they can spend their time screaming about his lack of ethics, are finally starting to punch back? Did Cuomo clear Bruno in an attempt to make Spitzer look bad, burnishing Cuomo's reputation as a fearless, even-handed investigator? Is Joe Bruno a slimy crook who misused state aircraft and got a pass because there were larger forces at play? It's hard to say, but, you know, it's Albany: Would anyone be surprised if the answer to all three questions were yes?

Bruno is clearly starting to overplay his hand. It's not hard to hear the desperation in this:

"He doesn't appear to have the temperament to govern, to negotiate in good faith, to compromise," Bruno said. Referring to Spitzer's now infamous steamroller he added, "most people would be kidding. He meant it."

Bruno has questioned whether Spitzer belongs in politics, and he has come to a conclusion.

"No," he said. "I don't think he does. He probably would have been great in real estate, where some people handle themselves differently than others. But real estate, you know, you're a hard driver, you drive a hard bargain for some people. That's probably where he belongs."

Oooh, poor Joe Bruno, victim. And it's not even the first time! Growing up, he was attacked by rich people - and the filthy Irish!
"We were discriminated against because we were the poorest people in town, immigrants, called every name in the book. Irish were at one end, we were at the other. And it was kid's stuff then, but it was very hurtful. In Catholic school, they discriminated. If you were from a wealthy family, you got treated differently than from a poor family, and that's kind of sad."
Mark this on your calendars as the day the momentum shifted back in the governor's direction. And shed a little tear for Joe Bruno, please. The poor fellow has been beset by assailants his whole life: First by wealthy Catholics, then by a rich Jew, and pretty soon, God willing, by the federal government, which is currently investigating his incredibly shady horse farm shenanigans. State politics is essentially a boring topic, but at this rate, we think we could find a lasting love for the subject.

Steamroller Joe [City Hall News]
Cuomo Cites Phantom Policy [NYS]

]]>
Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:00:32 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289197&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Shelly Silver Lends Eliot Spitzer A Hand ]]> godfather2senatecommittee1.JPGYou remember that scene in The Godfather, Part II where the Nevada senator wakes up in the whorehouse next to a dead prostitute and Corleone family consigliere Tom Hagen shows up and tells him, don't worry, we control this place, no one will ever know, we'll help you out? And then, for the rest of the movie, the Corleones own the Senator? For whatever reason, we were reminded of it when we saw the news yesterday that Assembly Speaker Shelly Silver was stepping up to defend Governor Spitzer in the recent Bruno brouhaha. It's almost like Silver and Bruno concocted some devious, complicated plan to roll the governor, making him wounded and dependent. Or, you know, maybe they just knew he'd fuck up on his own and decided to sit and wait for it. That's what they're good at, those guys.

ELSEWHERE: The Spitzer-controlled State Ethics Commission will launch an inquiry into the Bruno affair, possibly blunting the Senate's ability to do the same. Post bulldog Fred U. Dicker badgered (and battered) the governor at a press conference yesterday (watch the tremendously entertaining video here). And Wall Street enjoys a moment of shadenfreude.

]]>
Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:00:34 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=283167&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Joe Bruno Victimhood Campaign Rolls On ]]> news002.jpgNew York Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno continues to pound away at Eliot Spitzer, raising the possibility that the Senate may compel the governor to testify in one of the multiple investigations called for by Bruno over whether or not the governor's office improperly used the state police to track Bruno's questionable air travel. Good luck, says a spokesman for the governor, casting doubt on the Senate's constitutional authority to investigate internal executive affairs.

Spitzer himself sat down with the Daily News and repeated his claims that he knew nothing about his staff's investigation of Bruno: he didn't know they were doing it, he didn't know people were asking about it, he wasn't even sure who "Joe Bruno" was until just a couple of weeks ago, etc. The best analysis of the entire saga so far comes from a "smart friend" of Ben Smith's: "It seems to me the unspoken story here is that if the Spitzer people had given the records to [New York Post State Editor Fred U.] Dicker instead of the Times Union, the stories would all be about Bruno and he wouldn't be in this self-created mess. The real story is that once again Dicker has been shown to be the real power in Albany."

]]>
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:20:33 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282678&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Embattled Spitzer, Emboldened Cuomo ]]> PaybarahOn the second day after the release of a report from Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's office revealing that staffers working for Governor Eliot Spitzer aggressively attempted to discredit Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno, the stories keep coming. The governor was in Buffalo yesterday, where he couldn't avoid questions about the report. "All I can do is get back to business and that's what I am doing," he said. Meanwhile!


  • "Two of Gov. Eliot Spitzer's top staff members refused requests from the attorney general's office that they submit to interviews in the investigation of the administration's use of the State Police to tarnish a political rival." Notes the Post, "Because the probe of Spitzer was noncriminal, Cuomo's investigators did not have subpoena power to compel testimony."[NYT]
  • State Democrats aren't exactly lining up to support the governor. "The reluctance of Democrats to stand with Mr. Spitzer partly has to do with a fear of being associated with a dirty-tricks scandal involving the politicization of the state police force. Democrats interviewed said they are waiting to see if other allegations against the administration emerge that implicate other people in his administration." [NYS]
  • The Post looks at the Albany Times Union, the paper that went after Bruno's travel records in the first place, quite possibly at the behest of the administration. [NYP]
  • The Observer says it's Andrew Cuomo's moment: "Mr. Cuomo—who once had a reputation as a shameless self-promoter—has won positive reviews for his style since arriving in office. He has largely kept himself out of the public eye, emerging only to announce the positive results of some investigation (most notably in the case of a student loan scandal that garnered national attention) or to declare a lawsuit against some designated public villain. Or, as was the case this week, to deliver a swift and devastating blow to Eliot Spitzer." [NYO]
  • Great, overlooked point from Times columnist Jim Dwyer: "No one — including the attorney general — is volunteering to document how many thousands of dollars, and hundreds of hours of state police time, are used to carry politicians to events that are strictly party politics. 'Whatever facts we had are in the report, which speaks for itself,' a spokesman for Mr. Cuomo said." [NYT]
    [Image: Getty]

    ]]> Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:25:38 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282204&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf: "All ... ]]> Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf: "All kinds of forces that have an interest in weakening the governor are joining together, either directly or indirectly, to do so. So, it tells you about the lack of partisanship. The partisanship no longer matters. It's about ambition. Right? Protecting turf. The Republicans in the state Senate and the attorney general essentially have the same agenda right now. Think about it." [NYO]

    ]]>
    Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:07:51 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281783&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Is Eliot Spitzer Finished? ]]> spitzerHow screwed is Eliot Spitzer? That's probably the most important question after yesterday's release of a report by Attorney General Andrew Cuomo that accuses "Mr. Spitzer's communications director, Darren Dopp, and a top state homeland security official of ordering state police to take extraordinary measures to track the use of air and ground police escorts by the Republican Senate majority leader, Joseph Bruno, in an effort to catch him abusing state resources."

    The Times has a timeline of events in the controversy and you can read the full report here, but all you pretty much need to know is that this does not look good for a guy who rode into Albany claiming to be the last honest man. The governor is currently claiming to have known nothing about any of this, which would be slightly more credible if he weren't bragging all the time about his attention to detail and if he didn't advertise the fact that he was a self-righteous prick who would roll over his enemies to enact his agenda as some kind of selling point.

    What's next? Senate Republicans, predictably, are calling for an investigation, which will likely result in a few resignations among Spitzer aides and more damaging revelations about the governor's management style. What's the political fallout? Hard to tell just yet, but it doesn't look good: The Post (which, probably not incorrectly, claims that its reporting helped hasten the investigation) bites on the Republican talking points by claiming that this is Spitzer's Watergate; even the Times acknowledges that the governor's agenda is seriously imperiled. (Tangential, but also important: The Albany Times Union, which filed the original story about the investigation of Bruno, appears to have been completely in the tank for the administration).

    It's important to note that no one has been charged with anything illegal yet—even Bruno, whose dodgy air travel was ruled legal because he was smart enough to spend a couple of minutes talking politics on the days he used state planes to attend fundraisers.

    So, really, how screwed is Eliot Spitzer? While the Post quotes nervous unnamed Democrats who think Spitzer may not even seek re-election, that's an incredibly premature judgment. Let's face it: There's only one Republican with a shot at beating the governor statewide, and he just turned Independent a couple of weeks ago.

    reportIf we were Spitzer, we'd be more worried about Andrew Cuomo, who has a ton of cash in the bank and who—with this report—has somehow burnished his reputation as an independent politician who will go where the facts take him no matter what damage they do to his party. Looking back now at the endless Spitzer-Cuomo-Clinton tag-team extravaganza during last year's election, during which the three politicians criss-crossed Westchester and Long Island and points north (with the some-time tag-along of Bill Clinton), Cuomo look less like a Democratic party tool and junior of the bunch that he was then and more like the future Governor that he's been desperate to be since 1994.

    2010 is a long way away; for all we know (and we're giving even money) Bruno could be indicted on charges springing from the year-long federal investigation of his outside business dealings by then, which would take some of the sting out of the "abuse of power" charges we're sure to hear about over and over again. Perhaps the more appropriate question is: How screwed are we? Whatever you think about Spitzer, his main ambition was to scrape away at the calcification that makes "the most dysfunctional legislature in the nation" an easy-to-use cliché for Albany. Now that Bruno can claim victimhood, you can expect more of the same out of Albany at least until 2008, when the Democrats attempt to recapture the state Senate.

    So the only winner here is Andy Cuomo. He wins if he hurts Spitzer—and also wins if Hillary does. As comforting as it is to see Spitzer's arrogant mug forced to apologize for anything, for now we're right back where we were two years ago, with three men in a room cutting deals that do nothing for the health of the state.

    ]]>
    Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:23:37 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281673&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ New York State Senate majority leader Joe ... ]]> New York State Senate majority leader Joe Bruno cancels his subscription to the Albany Times-Union because it published stories about his taking trips in a state helicopter. [City Room/NYT]

    ]]>
    Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:45:25 EDT Doree Shafrir http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=274816&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ No Weddings For New York Homos This Year ]]> gayriotWhile the state assembly may be prepared to vote in gay marriage for New York, the measure has no chance of passing—or even reaching—the state Senate. Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno (R-Shadydealsburg) announced at a news conference today that "We're not doing gay marriage by Thursday; that's for sure, or this year. We're not going to take a vote; we have too many other issues. We're not going to spend hours debating an issue that, you know, is not going to be of consequence." What could possibly account for such antipathy to what, by now, must be seen as a basic human right? The Times' Danny Hakim may have put his finger on it.

    Finally, Mr. Bruno promoted the recent announcement by General Electric that the company would build a manufacturing plant in the capital region. Though the plant will have only a modest number of jobs, there is some significance to the announcement, because the former G.E. chief executive, John F. Welch Jr., swore off the state a number of years ago because of the high cost of doing business in New York.

    "When I talked to Jack Welch about 12 years ago," Mr. Bruno said, "he told me where I could go... it was an uncomfortable place."

    See, Jack Welch permanently put the fear of assfucking in Bruno's heart! (And, presumably, ass.) Guess we'll have to wait until Joe finally gets indicted and someone else steps in before the bill has a shot.

    Bruno Says 'We're Not Doing Gay Marriage' [NYT]

    UPDATE: New York State Assembly Approves Gay Marriage Law [Gay City News]

    ]]>
    Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:21:26 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=270302&view=rss&microfeed=true